Google Ads

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

This form does not yet contain any fields.
    « Dell shrinks the Container Data Center to 45kW, targeting the Military Market | Main | TSA Pre is great, my experience through SEA and PDX »

    Oops Natural Gas's CO2 footprint could be higher than Coal

    Forbes has an article that accounts for Natural Gas through its life cycle, not just in consumption.

    Traditionally, we use emission numbers just for the power plant itself, that is, how much CO2 does a coal plant emit in producing a kWhr of electricity versus a gas plant versus a wind turbine, etc. These numbers have some emissions from other parts of the plant life-cycle such as construction and mining, as these dominate the emissions for energy sources like nuclear, hydro and wind which emit no GHG during operation.

    Until now, the average equivalent grams of CO2emitted per kWhr produced has been calculated as 975 gCO2/kWhr from coal; 600 gCO2/kWhr from natural gas; 90 gCO2/kWhr from hydro; 55 gCO2/kWhr from solar; 15 gCO2/kWhr from wind, and 15 gCO2/kWhr from nuclear (Parliamentary Office of Science and TechnologyGHG from Power Plants).

    One calculation that has stirred debate is that the natural gas number is as high as 1200 gCO2/kWhr.

    However, new studies by Robert Howarth and associates at Cornell University (GHG Footprint of Natural GasNational Climate Assessment; thanks to atomikrabbit for pointing me in this direction) provide emissions data from the entire natural gas life-cycle. Their results bump this number for gas from 600 gCO2/kWhr to over 1,200 gCO2/kWhr, making natural gas the largest emitter of GHGs in electricity generation. On the other hand, Howarth and company have been challenged by others that say their numbers are too high (BusinessWeek), particularly Lawrence M. Cathles, also of Cornell. Cathles contends that gas is still better than coal with respect to global warming. Even if Cathles is correct and 600 gCO2/kWhr is still the number for gas, it’s not that much better than coal compared to ther energy sources like hydro and nuclear.

    For those of you have just switched to a power generation mix that has more natural gas than coal, you may be stuck again.  And, your carbon footprint may be much bigger than you thought.

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    References (1)

    References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
    • Response
      Oops Natural Gas's CO2 footprint could be higher than Coal - Green (Low Carbon) Data Center Blog - Green Data Center Blog

    Reader Comments (2)

    I think this could be because we produce more CO2 now than before.
    July 16, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterCritical Systems Inc
    Fuck Ass
    July 25, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterFuck

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>