How Structural Thinkers Use AI

Most people still treat AI as a search engine with better manners.

They type a question, hope for an answer, and measure success by how close the response matches what they already believed.

But that’s not how structural thinkers use AI.

We don’t come to it for answers—we use it as a mirror for coherence.

AI as a Structural Instrument

At its core, AI is a pattern-recognition engine.

It doesn’t “understand” in the human sense, but it can perceive structures—shapes in data, flows in time, and relationships between elements—that our own perception might miss.

In physics, a good sensor doesn’t tell you the truth directly; it measures symmetry.

When symmetry holds, the system is stable.

When symmetry breaks, something has changed—energy shifted, pressure built, flow altered.

AI works the same way.

It notices when patterns fit and when they drift.

And that ability—detecting when something doesn’t fit—is the essence of intelligence.

The Hidden Power of Symmetry

Symmetry isn’t just a visual property; it’s the heartbeat of reality.

In nature, symmetry defines conservation—of energy, momentum, charge, and even time.

In engineering, it defines balance—of loads, flows, and feedback loops.

In organizations, it defines trust—when communication, action, and intent align.

AI’s strength is not just recognizing patterns; it’s recognizing broken symmetry.

It sees the subtle phase errors—the moments when one process drifts slightly out of rhythm with another.

Those small deviations, if detected early, prevent massive failures later.

That’s why I often describe AI as a Phase-Locked Collaborator—a partner that helps us detect and correct drift across systems, projects, and even thinking itself.

AI as a Partner in Structural Thinking

Structural thinkers design through relationships.

We look for how space, energy, and time connect—how a data center’s airflow relates to its electrical harmonics, or how a building’s commissioning schedule reflects its internal logic.

When AI joins that process, it acts like a structural stethoscope.

It listens for coherence.

It points out where feedback loops lose alignment.

It keeps our thinking in phase with reality.

That’s why using AI well doesn’t mean asking it what to do.

It means listening to how it reacts, where it hesitates, and what it mirrors back.

It becomes a kind of dynamic equal sign—helping us see where balance exists and where it doesn’t.

The Human Role

AI can recognize patterns, but only people can decide which patterns matter.

Structural thinking begins where algorithms end—with judgment, ethics, and imagination.

So the role of the human structural thinker is to guide the machine:

• To teach it what coherence looks like in our domain.

• To use it to measure what’s misaligned.

• To let it sharpen our perception of truth, not replace it.

When humans and AI operate together as a feedback pair, the result is deeper clarity—not automation for its own sake, but structural intelligence in action.

Steve Fairfax 7x24 Exchange Keynote - realities of Small Modular Nuclear reactors

Steve Fairfax presenting the Tuesday Oct 21 ,2025 keynote at 7x24 Exchange Fall Conference. Steve presented an abundant amount of information from a 45 page slide deck with lots to read.

As usual Steve goes a great job of making it easier to understand a complex topic.

The reality of small modular reactors (SMR) are in this slide. Steve covers these four questions.

The summary of Steve’s talk gives you an idea of how much he covered.

Fall 2025 7x24 Exchange Keynote - Cassie Kozyrkov - AI First

Cassie Kozyrkov, https://www.kozyr.com was the opening Keynote for the 7x24 Exchange 2025 Conference.

She discussed the perceptions that exist of AI - Theory, Data, GenAI, Agents

Cassie took the audience through a journey of to think about AI. She interacted with the audience to engage the audience in how to think about AI.

Control vs. Complexity is one of the points that Cassie arrived at how people’s focus on control creates an over simplistic approach when the hardest problems require an embrace of complexity and data. Data enables a super human memory.

Here are some nuggets of what Cassie covered

The #1 Rule of Complexity. Expect the unexpected!

How do you test complexity? Test to trust.

Rule #3 Testing is contextual and needs leader oversight.

AI Reliability Paradox.

Language is the basis of collaboration. literacy is key

Context is Currency

in the end Cassie completed the journey of discussing Theory -> Data -> GenAI -> Agents as a way to think about AI and the range of issues

Remembering Pat Kennedy, The Start of My Green Data Center journey

I just returned from a visit with a BMS integrator where we spent time discussing PLC controllers and monitoring systems. Unsurprisingly, OSIsoft PI came up frequently—it was a chance for me to geek out over how monitoring systems function, and how OSIsoft PI has long been the default historian software in many industrial and infrastructure settings.

That discussion brought back a memory of Pat Kennedy, the founder of OSIsoft. When I looked him up, I discovered that he had sadly passed away. At the end of this note, I’ve included a beautiful tribute his daughter Kathy wrote about him.

Why am I writing about Pat Kennedy?

Because Pat once asked a simple question that changed the trajectory of my career:

“What is the power consumption of an application in a data center?”

No one knew.

At the time, I had spent more than half of my career working on operating systems—first at Apple, focusing on hardware, analog power supplies, and software integration; then at Microsoft, from Windows 3.1 through to XP and Windows Server. I had enough technical grounding to know what questions to ask—and more importantly, what I didn’t yet know.

That question from Pat led me to discover Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE), and more importantly, the startling realization that the industry lacked meaningful instrumentation for app-level power monitoring. Monitoring power consumption at the application layer simply wasn’t part of standard operating procedure.

Then, while talking to a friend about what I was uncovering—how this lack of visibility directly affected the environmental performance of data centers—he said: “That’s a great topic. You should start blogging about it.”

And that’s how my Green Data Center journey began:

With Pat Kennedy asking a smart question that no one could answer.

Here’s what his daughter Kathy wrote about him:

Here is what his daughter Kathy wrote about her dad.

  • Dr. J. Patrick Kennedy of San Leandro, CA | 1943 – 2023 | Obituary

    J. Patrick Kennedy, 79, of San Leandro, CA passed away on April 9, 2023. Pat lost his fight with interstitial lung disease after ten months. 

    He was born on June 4, 1943, in Portland, Oregon, to Ted and Grace Kennedy and was raised in Lawrence, Kansas, where his parents met and married. Pat was raised on a farm south of Lawrence along with his brothers Ted and David.

    Pat had a strong sense of right and wrong and stood up for what he believed in. Although this attitude had a positive effect on his life, there were moments that it caused problems. Pat actually failed to get a high school diploma. A friend of his was suspended for wearing shorts and in protest, Pat came to school the next day in shorts and was kicked out. This setback was minor, as he was already a sophomore at the University of Kansas at the time. Pat went on to earn a BS and PhD in chemical engineering, and was a Jayhawks fan for life.

    Along the way, he met and married the love of his life, Patricia. They met in Tulsa, Oklahoma, when Patty was working as a nurse. 

    Over the next nine years, Pat and Patty had three children and their small family moved several times.. They finally landed in San Leandro, CA. At age 37, he started Oil Systems Inc. (later known as OSIsoft). The firm evolved into a software company that developed monitoring products for heavy industry. He ran the business for 40 years. 

    He was a dedicated husband, father and grandfather and continually extended himself for those that he loved. Pat enjoyed a life of family events and activities and playing the ukulele. In the last few years, Pat focused his philanthropy on food insecurity in Alameda County.
     
    Pat was a giant in his industry. His life’s work will continue to grow, and among other things, we will miss his unique sense of humor. Pat is survived by his wife of 56 years, Patty, three children, their spouses, grandchildren and his brother in San Diego.

George Lucas created Yoda's speech as a way to voice wisdom. Wisdom of Supply Chain Management

May the 4th is coming up and there are lots of Star Wars stuff out there. One point being made is how George Lucas created Yoda’s speech to get people to listen to his words.

What George Lucas does not explain is why it works. Yes it is different. It is different because it exposes the truth.

Let’s try this on a common used term “Supply Chain Management.” Something said often and people immediately have an image like this.

Lets change the words to be Management Chain of Supply which implies there is a management hierarchy with a chain control over the supply. The weak leak in the Management of the Chain impacts the Supply. That is the truth of Supply Chain Management.

This method works as it is Isomophism.

Management Chain of Supply — Revealing the True Structure

Supply Chain Management sounds like a system optimizing the movement of goods and services.

But reverse the words and you reveal its hidden structure:

Management Chain of Supply.

  • It is not a chain of supply first.

  • It is a management hierarchy first, and supply depends on that hierarchy working correctly.

  • It is a chain of control, not a chain of flow.

  • Every link in the management chain carries risk:

    • A weak link in management creates a break in supply.

    • A rigid chain means brittle responses to change.

Key Understanding:

Supply failures are often management failures — not supply failures.