Monday, September 24, 2012 at 10:11PM
Mike has posted the rest of the story on what happened in Quincy, WA in response to the NYTimes' 2nd story on Microsoft's efforts.
Insider Redux: Data Barn in a Farm Town
September 24, 2012 by mmanos
I thought I would start my first post by addressing the second New York Times article first. Why? Because it specifically mentions activities and messages sourced from me at the time when I was responsible for running the Microsoft Data Center program. I will try to track the timeline mentioned in the article with my specific recollections of the events. As Paul Harvey used to say, so then you could know the ‘REST of the STORY’.
One of the main points of the NYTimes is the air pollution. Mike tells the rest of the story.
The article then goes on to talk about the permitting for the Diesel generators. Through the admission of the Department of Ecology’s own statement, “At the time, we were in scramble mode to permit our first one of these data centers.” Additionally it also states that:
Although emissions containing diesel particulates are an environmental threat, they were was not yet classified as toxic pollutants in Washington. The original permit did not impose stringent limits, allowing Microsoft to operate its generators for a combined total of more than 6,000 hours a year for “emergency backup electrical power” or unspecified “maintenance purposes.”