Green A Data Center with Data

GigaOm's Stacey Higginbotham posts on the panel discussion I moderated at GigaOm Structure Data.

I want to thank Tamara Budec (Goldman Sachs), Heather Marquez (Facebook) and Amaya Souarez (Microsoft) for joining me on a great topic to discuss.

Want a better/greener/more agile data center? Use the data.

 

1 HOUR AGO

1 Comment

Structure Data 2013 Amaya Souarez Microsoft Heather Marquez Facebook Tamara Budec Goldman Sachs & Co
photo: Albert Chau
SUMMARY:

Want to see big data in action? When it comes to planning out data center capacity, data can influence everything from the power usage to planning for disasters.

Stacey does a great job of summarizing the talk.

If you want to see the video you can see it here.

CIA hires Amazon to build a private cloud, can't imagine it being a public cloud

I ran into Barb Darrow yesterday and we chatted about her post on the CIA contracting Amazon to build a cloud.

Report: The CIA and Amazon are in cahoots over secret cloud

 

20 HOURS AGO

4 Comments

fingerprint secret
photo: Thinkstock
SUMMARY:

Who better to show the CIA how to build a cloud than Amazon Web Services? No one’s confirming anything but an AWS-CIA contract would make sense for both parties.

Now here’s a story that will probably never get confirmed:  Federal Computer Week is reporting that the Central Intelligence Agency has contracted cloud kingpin Amazon Web Services to build a cloud for the super secret spy agency.

There can be a lot of speculation on what kind of cloud the CIA would want, but one thing is almost for sure.  The CIA cloud is not a public cloud.

One data point is Amazon's continued expansion in Ashburn, VA.

For what it’s worth, Amazon’s biggest and oldest data center farm, US-East, is in Ashburn, Virg., and it is reportedly expanding its presence there with another huge data center farm. The CIA is based about 20 miles away in Langley, Virg.

Off to my 1st GigaOm Structure Data Conference

I have spent so much of my life traveling I really don't like getting on a plane for longer than 2 hours.  In general I try not to make East Coast trips.  But, I do get to the East Coast a couple of times a year.  Tomorrow I head to NYC for my first GigaOm Structure Data Conference. 

Structure:Data
Mar. 20 & 21, 2013 – New York

The volume of enterprise data has moved past terabytes and into the petabyte scale. Companies need to determine the best way for them to store, manage and analyze all that information. GigaOM’s Structure:Data, now a two-day conference, assembles the world’s leading technologists, practitioners and business leaders to offer solutions and uncover new business opportunities.

The main reason I am heading out is to moderate the below panel discussion.  I do freelance for GigaOm Pro, so I get to chat with the GigaOm folks often, and I am looking forward to connect with East Coast crowd as I tend to stay on the West Coast.  Ins fact, I was able to get two people from the West Coast to come out for this panel.

SEEING EVERYTHING TO GET READY FOR ANYTHING: CAPACITY PLANNING AT SCALE

 

Do you have a problem planning for future infrastructure needs? Deciding on what to buy and what capacity to provision for? Then you should attend this session, where we examine the stories of four people with some of the most extreme use cases on the planet. Come listen and learn from those with responsibility for the biggest purse strings.

Moderated by:Dave Ohara - Founder, GreenM3 and Analyst, GigaOM Research
Speakers:Tamara Budec - VP Critical Systems and Engineering, Goldman Sachs & Co
 
Heather Marquez - Manager, Asset Strategy and Optimization, Facebook
 
Amaya Souarez - Director, Datacenter Services, Microsoft 

Quanta's Direct sales transformation 65% in 2012, expected to be 85% in 2013

Quanta was mostly known as an ODM, the guys who the OEMs went to make their hardware.  But, Quanta has made the move to be in the direct sales business and guess what they are moving very fast.

Compaq was the beginning of the some of the first dual processor, dual hard drive, x86 based servers. In the beginning it was Compaq, HP and IBM who had the knowledge to build servers.  Over time to reduce costs the manufacturing was move to Asia and eventually the engineering was moved to Asia, leaving the OEMs to have the customer relationship.  In the shift to the bigger data center players.  Remember 5 years ago how small Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, and Apple's data centers were?  Now they are the dominant players and there has been a shift to the economies of scale with 10,000s of servers a small yearly order.  The big guys buy 100,000s of servers a year.

This shift benefits a player like Quanta.

GigaOm has an article on Quanta.

How an unknown Taiwanese server maker is eating the big guys’ lunch

 

MAR. 16, 2013 - 1:30 PM PDT

No Comments

SONY DSC
SUMMARY:

In the server business, Taiwanese hardware company Quanta has shifted from an original-design manufacturer to much more of a direct seller. It wants to extend the trend and sell other products, too.

Here is the part that caught my eye.

Back then, Quanta didn’t sell servers directly to customers, it only built them for traditional server vendors who then put their name on them and sold them to customers. Fast forward a few years, and a majority of Quanta’s server revenue stems from direct deals — 65 percent in 2012, and a forecasted 85 percent this year.

Quanta is expanding the cloud hub of development in Seattle.

Next month, the company will open an office in Seattle in order to be closer to customers. Yang said Quanta has several customers in the area, although he declined to name them. Microsoft, which is building huge data center capacity for Windows Azure and its Live offerings, is a short drive from Seattle, in Redmond, Wash., and Seattle is much closer to Quincy, Wash., a hotbed of data centers, than the Fremont office. Quanta will add more U.S. offices for sales and service this year, Yang said.

$9 megawatt-hr difference in profit margin for coal makes it hard for Europe to pass on Coal

National Geographic has a post on the shift in the USA to cleaner Natural Gas and the rise of coal exports.

The reality is it is hard for European power producers to pass on a $9 megawatt-hour difference in profit margin if they use coal vs. natural gas.

European utilities are now finding that generating power from coal is a profitable gambit. In the power industry, the profit margin for generating electricity from coal is called the "clean dark spread"; at the end of December in Great Britain, it was going for about $39 per megawatt-hour, according to Argus. By contrast, the profit margin for gas-fired plants—the "clean spark spread"—was about $3. Tomas Wyns, director of the Center for Clean Air Policy-Europe, a nonprofit organization in Brussels, Belgium, said those kinds of spreads are typical across Europe right now.

The article has lots of data like the drop in US coal powered electricity from 50% to 37.4%.

The reason is clear: Coal, which in 2005 generated 50 percent of U.S. electricity, saw its share erode to 37.4 percent in 2012, according to EIA's new short-term energy outlook. An increase in U.S. renewable energy certainly played a role; renewables climbed in those seven years from 8.7 percent to 13 percent of the energy mix, about half of it hydropower. But the big gain came from natural gas, which climbed from 19 percent to 30.4 percent of U.S. electricity during that time frame, primarily because of abundant supply and low prices made possible by hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. (Related: "Natural Gas Stirs Hope and Fear in Pennsylvania" and interactive, "Breaking Fuel From the Rock")

And points to other sources like the US Energy Information Associations data that 27 gigawatts of coal-fired capacity to be retired in 5 years.

27 gigawatts of coal-fired capacity to retire over next five years

graph of Historic and planned retirements of coal-fired generators, as described in the article text

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-860, "Annual Electric Generator Report." 
Note: Data for 2005 through 2011 represent actual retirements. Data for 2012 through 2016 represent planned retirements, as reported to EIA. Data for 2011 through 2016 are early-release data and not fully vetted. Capacity values represent net summer capacity

Plant owners and operators report to EIA that they expect to retire almost 27 gigawatts (GW) of capacity from 175 coal-fired generators between 2012 and 2016. In 2011, there were 1,387 coal-fired generators in the United States, totaling almost 318 GW. The 27 GW of retiring capacity amounts to 8.5% of total 2011 coal-fired capacity.