Win X vs. OS X, Microsoft skips Windows 9 to 10

Microsoft just announced Windows 10, skipping Windows 9.  

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - The next version of Microsoft's flagship operating system will be called Windows 10, as the company skips version 9 to emphasize advances it is making toward a world centered around mobile devices and Internet services.

Wouldn’t it be funny if instead of Windows 10, it was Win X.  The ad battles between Apple and Microsoft would be so much more entertaining. Win X vs. OS X.  BTW, the apple guys always say “OS Ten” not “OS X”.

OS X, whose X is the Roman numeral for 10 and is a prominent part of its brand identity, is built on technologies developed at NeXT between the second half of the 1980s and Apple's purchase of the company in late 1996. The 'X' is also used to emphasize the relatedness between OS X and UNIX.

Check out this comparison between Windows 7 vs. Macs.

DCIM ≠ ECMA - 400 Smart Data Centre Resource Monitoring and Control Standard, Why Not?

I was chatting with Intel’s Henry Wong at Intel Developer Forum and he mentioned the ECMA-400 standard.

NewImage

Introduction 

Operation of data centres requires management of storage, computation, communication, electrical energy and temperature to achieve the required quality of service and efficiency parameters. Often, however, the separate management of Information Technology (IT), electrical energy (or power) and cooling Resource islands yields a sub-optimal result. 

This Standard provides Messages that facilitate integrated or “smart” monitoring and control of Resources in those islands. The Messages are exchanged between the Management Function and Resources. The Standard acknowledges that those Resources may be composed of other Resources (e.g. a rack may contain servers, ventilators, etc.). In addition, e.g. those servers may be viewed from their computing, energy consumption or dissipation aspects which this Standard models as Resource Components and groups into IT, power and fluid Domains, respectively.

This specific seems like it should be associated with DCIM, but when I ran a google search on “ecma 400 dcim”  the results showed up without DCIM and when DCIM was used the 400 didn’t refer to the standard.

DCIM = ECMA-400 should be the state

DCIM ≠ ECMA-400 is the current state.  When will someone fix this?  Seems like someone out of all the DCIM vendors would be looking at working the ECMA-400.  

  • Smart Data Centre Resource Monitoring and Control - Ecma ...

    www.ecma-international.org/.../ECMA.../ECMA-400....
    Ecma International
     
    Annex A (normative) ECMA-400 Edition 1 Resource configuration options ............. ................................. 27. A.1. SDC VM Allocation Option.
    Missing: dcim
  • Index of Ecma Standards - Ecma International

    www.ecma-international.org/.../Stnindex.htm
    Ecma International
     
    ECMA-328 · ECMA-341 · ECMA-370 · ECMA-383 · ECMA-389 · ECMA-393 · ECMA-400. Safety, EMC and EMF, Acoustical Emissions, Environmental Product  ...
    Missing: dcim
  • 2 - AltaTerra Research

    www.altaterra.net/.../Zen-and-the-Art-of-Data-Center-Greening-and-Ener...
     
    So his breakdowns are: 1) 480/277V AC, 2) 400/230V AC, 3) 48V DC, 4) 380V .... as the EPA, ECMA and Climate Savers that promote a similar goal and vision.



Telling Story with Pictures, Blurry is OK

When you take pictures, the presence of blur, by being out of focus, motion of camera, or motion of subject ruins the shot you took.  But, when it comes to action sports blur can tell the story of motion.  Yesterday I was at my son’s football game and was on the chain gang.  That gave me a chance to take pictures close to the action.  Using a dslr wouldn’t work and using a smartphone wouldn’t either.  I used my Sony RX100 which is prosumer compact camera, it has a full size sensor at 20 megapixel with a leica lens, so it can capture photos that look as good as a dslr. Working the chains I couldn’t be distracted fussing with the camera so I put it in programmed mode and just shot away, pointing the camera in the direction of the action and not looking at the screen.  The following are shots that tell a story.

The below shows left red defender in focus.  The ball runner is blurred with motion, but his left hand extended is not.  The right defender’s movement makes it look like he isn’t significant threat.

NewImage

I was panning with the runner so he is in focus whereas everyone else is blurry in their movement relative to him.

NewImage

The kids running towards me are clear, the defender to the right is crossing.  So he is blurred showing his speed towards the ball carrier.

NewImage

At the start of a play everyone is clear, except the ball which is moving faster so it is blurry.

NewImage

Normally with my camera I would focus on getting shots with no blurriness like.

NewImage

The ball carrier being tackled is in focus as he is moving slower than the rest and he is moving towards the camera.

NewImage

Everyone is moving in the same direction.  There is little blur as 5 defenders are after the ball carrier.

NewImage

Here are a few more.  You get the idea. These blurry pictures worked well to tell the action of the game.  I guess blurriness is not such a bad thing.

NewImage

NewImage

Here is a photo with little blur.  Final score 33-0.

NewImage

 

Where can you find the 4 DCIM companies in THE Magic Quadrant? Gartner Data Center World 2014 exhibitor floor of course

The media picked up on 4 DCIM companies who made the Magic Quadrant.

Gartner has released its first Magic Quadrant (MQ) report on Data Center Infrastructure Management, laying out the market and positions for several DCIM providers across the four quadrants of leaders, challengers, visionaries and niche players.

NewImage

 

I went to Gartner Data Center World website to see if the above are exhibitors.

Have you ever known a company who makes the Magic Quadrant not be at a Gartner event?  So what came first being in the Magic Quadrant or being a Gartner Exhibitor?  Or was it simultaneous?  You get it.  There I go getting myself Black Listed again.  :-)

Fix those LinkedIn typo mistakes, 113 years at Microsoft is not right

There is a wave of people going through the process of creating resumes and LinkedIn profiles given latest layoffs.  One of my friend asked if I knew person x who had been at the company 26 years.  Yes.  Curious I looked up his LinkedIn profile, and saw this.

Group Program Manager

Microsoft Corporation

September 1901 – Present (113 years 1 month)

Suggestion.  Ask your friends to proof read your LinkedIn profile.  It is too easy to make a typo mistake.