Operations IT, a new role for IOT

Stacey Higginbotham on StaceyOnIOT posts on a new role in IT for Industrial and and Enterprise IOT.

As technology comes for more and more of the corporation, from conference rooms to manufacturing plants, there’s a culture clash brewing between the IT department and the folks responsible for operations. Because while those operations might be focused on maintaining the safety and comfort of those conference rooms or managing the safety in that manufacturing plant, when everything gets a computer and a potential connection to the internet, it all becomes part of IT.

In this post Stacey highlights a problem in operations of a BASF plant with WiFI out for 11 months to support the sensor network. Stacey expresses a sense of shock that this happened.

But they didn’t replace it. Odom said the plant has now been without Wi-Fi, and thus this particular system, ever since the IT team took it down 11 months ago. Recently, the plant experienced an equipment failure that cost “something in the six figures,” which would have been detected by the vibration sensors had they been operational. Odom said that her notes to the IT department had not had any effect, but she hoped that the equipment failure — a clear example of how the lack of Wi-Fi was costing BASF money — might inspire a bit of urgency.

That is a particularly egregious example of a corporate IT department not communicating with an operational tech team. But while I was stunned by the idea that a section of a plant might be without Wi-Fi for 11 months, most of the other attendees didn’t seem surprised. As to how anything got done at all, there were other Wi-Fi networks in the plant — just not ones this particular system could use.

This is easy to see happening as the the corporate IT department wanted to show it knows better and choose to shut down the risky hardware. IT addressed a risk, and put the replacement project in the queue to be worked on when they have budget and time.

Would this situation be prevented by the role of Operations IT? Not necessarily. This is why almost all the big data center groups have their own IT group for their operations which is separate from the enterprise IT group. Operations has their own budget and resources to work on the problems to keep their business running. Running office space for enterprise staff is so different than operations that needs to run beyond an 8 hour day and has a direct impact on the business when there is an outage.

More Than 3 Use cases of IOT, building on StaceyOnIOT's post

On Aug 19, 2019 Stacey On IOT posted on three different version of IOT. Where she discussed Consumer, Enterprise, and Industrial use cases. I was going to post, but did not. Stacey followed up today with another post with user feedback and the idea of adding two more use cases for Military and Healthcare.

Across these now five different use cases what is common approach that could be used? An approach that have been using to look at some other systems is a combination of hexagonal architecture, ports and adapters and domain driven design. Ok. Lost all of you there.

Hexagonal architecture is

The hexagonal architecture divides a system into several loosely-coupled interchangeable components, such as the application core, the database, the user interface, test scripts and interfaces with other systems. This approach is an alternative to the traditional layered architecture.

Ports and Adapters is

The main idea of Ports & Adapters is to define the structure of an application so that it could be run by different kinds of clients (humans, tests cases, other applications,…), and it could be tested in isolation from external devices of the real world that the application depends on (databases, servers, other applications, …).

Domain Driven Design is

Domain-driven design is predicated on the following goals:

  • placing the project's primary focus on the core domain and domain logic;

  • basing complex designs on a model of the domain;

  • initiating a creative collaboration between technical and domain experts to iteratively refine a conceptual model that addresses particular domain problems.

OK still lost you. The use cases of consumer, industrial, enterprise, military and healthcare are domains that are at the center of the architecture. The interaction with IOT and users is what drives the ports and adapters to the domain core, then gets passed on to ports and adapters for the infrastructure. This same system design can treat of the different uses as simply different iterations of the same design approach.

This is a complex topic, but can be elegantly simple. But explaining the simplicity takes a lot more words. :-)

StorageMojo blog went into Hiatus after over 10 years of blogging

StorageMojo was one of the leading blogs on storage. I had the pleasure to meet Robin Harris the owner of StorageMojo at a storage conference and he is a genuine person who wanted to change the storage industry. Robin’s last post is here.

Times have changed and Robin makes a good observation.

Looking back, I started StorageMojo at a propitious time, catching the wave of scale-out storage, SSDs, advanced erasure codes, and cloud, where intelligent commentary was eagerly consumed, and advertising was still a useful adjunct for a one-man consultancy. Times were good, and the Great Recession was something I only read about.

Robin still writes about storage on ZDNET and here is one of his latest post that discusses emerging storage technologies.

IT executives face a constant barrage of "new and improved" product claims. But data storage has changed more in the last 10 years than in the prior 25, and the rate of change is accelerating: We'll see more change in the next decade than we've ever seen before in computer data storage. Here's what's coming that you need to know.

Understanding what is coming -- some in the next few months -- will position savvy technology leaders to be proactive, value-added change agents. The innovations are real and fundamental, affecting how data centers are architected and managed, as well as enabling incredible new applications.

Scooter company Spin deploys at Virginia Tech with lots of sensors and cameras to gain insight

Wired has an article on scooter company Spin working with Virginia Tech to understand the use of scooters.

It’s also an 18-month research project. Of the 300 scooters that Spin will drop upon the 4-square-mile campus next week, 50 will be wired with sensors—gyroscopes, accelerometers, and forward-facing cameras—designed to record very specific data about how the two-wheeled vehicles are moving through space. At least 20 cameras will also stud the campus, to observe scooter riders in their natural habitat.

Ford could be a player in mobile electric transportation. The data they get could enable addressing many other issues in transportation and other services.

Ford has had previous success with scooter-based research. In the fall of 2018, the automaker’s mobility division quietly launched a scooter service on the campus of Purdue University in Indiana. The research there convinced Ford that scooters were viable from a business perspective, says Sweeney—helping justify its purchase of Spin, for a reported $100 million. With more questions to answer, the automaker turned scooter operator is heading back to school.