Newsweek throws out ideas on who will head Obama’s Energy Dept.

Who Will Sit at Energy?

Daniel Stone

Obama's cabinet choices thus far reveal the president-elect's desire to tap big names with long national resumes—Hillary, Robert Gates, Bill Richardson—over the lesser-known folks who wouldn't add shock value but might bring some field or industry experience to his table. With several key cabinet posts still to fill, one pick in particular will reveal exactly how Obama is thinking and what his broader vision is for his cabinet. Whoever he chooses to sit at the head of Energy—one of the several issues he attached the word "crisis" to (economic and environmental were the others)—will indicate exactly how big a risk Obama wants to take on an issue with extremely high stakes.

On the list is Google’s Dan Reicher, Director of Climate Change.

But Obama did campaign on the promise of change. Which shines some light on Dan Reicher, director of climate change and energy initiatives for Google, the Internet giant that seems to have staked its future on getting ahead of everything related to innovation. Google has devoted significant resources to energy tech and power generation for several reasons (not least of which to power its massive farms of computer servers). Reicher served for a period as assistant energy secretary during the Clinton administration, but in moving from Silicon Valley to Washington, he would bring something unique: private-sector experience and a mind-set not currently limited by the bounds of government. Worth mentioning in the same vein is John Bryson, former chairman of Edison International and co-chair of the Electric Drive Transportation Association.

Advertisement

Google's Reicher, though, does seem to be the man to watch. At the Democratic National Convention in August, an Obama strategist pointed toward Reicher and told a NEWSWEEK reporter "Keep and eye on that guy, they've been talking about him a lot."

News.com has another post on Google/Yahoo ad deal.

Early Wednesday morning, the Department of Justice notified Yahoo and Google that if they proceeded with their controversial search agreement, it would file a lawsuit to block the deal.

In some ways, the DOJ's decision was not terribly surprising. Over the past two or three weeks, federal antitrust regulators became increasingly wary of the agreement and, in particular, tested Google's resolve to remain in the deal, according to sources. Over the past few weeks, the give-and-take of negotiations between the parties seemed to be forward progress, but faltered as government regulators became increasingly unyielding in their demands.

"Up until a few weeks ago, there was a lot of back and forth," said one source. "After that, they began turning everything down."

The M work was mentioned as striking a nerve.

Then things headed further south. Regulators, at one point two or three weeks ago, told Google that if it pursued a lawsuit to block the deal, it may consider adding a monopolization count against Google to the complaint, which in essence would allege the search giant of using its monopoly power in a relevant market. Apparently that hit a nerve with the search giant, noted a source, and it became evident to regulators that Google's resolve to fight a legal battle was wavering, rather than face the prospect of being saddled with the label of a monopolist and all the regulatory oversight that could potentially come with it.

Wouldn’t it make for an interesting world if Google and Microsoft were declared monopolies?

Can the EU be next thinking of declaring Google a monopoly? In Germany, a .com executive told me 90% of search is Google.