85% of Army's Diesel used to Cool the Troops and Computers

WSJ's environmental blog has a post about the US Army Green efforts.  In it they mention 85% of Army's diesel is used to provide cooling for

the troops and  computer equipment.

About 85% of the diesel hauled up to forward areas goes straight into air-conditioning, both for tired soldiers and to keep communications equipment cool. That means more, larger, and more vulnerable supply lines targeted by insurgents. Just spraying foam insulation on Army tents cut energy loss by 45%, Reuters reports.

And just as Baghdad is installing solar-powered streelights to improve security, clean energy could mean immediate security for American troops, and not just eventual energy independence for the American people:

“If we can reduce consumption on our forward operating bases by using renewable energy, let’s say wind or solar instead of a diesel generator outside the tent … then we can reduce the number of these supply convoys that need to come forward that are getting hit by these IEDs,” [said the Pentagon’s Deputy Assistant Secretary for environment, safety, and occupational health Tad] Davis.

The Pentagon is among the country’s biggest users of electricity and transport fuels, and the run-up in oil prices has led to a four-fold increase in the Pentagon’s gas bill since the Iraq war started. Most of its environmental initiatives so far have been like those of any other big, multinational firm—simple measures that reduce energy use and save money, and thus free up resources for other uses.

And even the Army is thinking Green.

Army Green: U.S. Military Gunning to Curb Carbon ‘Bootprint’

Posted by Keith Johnson

IraqConvoy_art_200_20080728114223.jpg

Expensive supply lines (AP)

The U.S. military has been trying to green up its operations in response to skyrocketing energy bills, toying with everything from biofuel for Air Force planes to solar panels at air bases.
On the ground, the lean green fighting machine is now trying to live up to all its name implies—and save lives in the process.

Reuters reports on the U.S. Army’s latest initiative to cut its own greenhouse-gas emissions by 30% in 2015—its carbon “bootprint.” One of the biggest opportunities? Slimming down the massive and vulnerable supply convoys carrying fuel for the mobile and energy-hungry U.S. forces operating in forward areas of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Read more

Sun's CIO writes Forbes Commentary, provides Green Data Center ideas

Forbes has a commentary by Sun's CIO, Bob Worrall.

Commentary
A Green Budget Line
Bob Worrall 07.28.08, 6:00 AM ET

Bob Worrall

pic

While the headlines are focused on nearly $5 gas and its impact on consumers, skyrocketing energy prices also are biting into information technology organizations as the costs of powering and cooling data centers reach all-time highs. In many companies, the cost to run data centers is now the second-largest expense after people. And the cost of powering data centers worldwide could grow from $18.5 billion in 2005 to $250 billion by 2012. There is no better time than right now to focus investment on more energy-efficient data centers.

Making the data center greener has been a hard sell. Most decision makers find the goal of reducing carbon emissions laudable but are held back by concerns that it will cut into profits or performance. When energy costs were relatively low, arguing that a current investment would reduce future costs was an uphill battle. But today's environment might provide the harsh dollars-and-cents context that's needed to move this issue from a decision about being green to one about being fiscally responsible.

Bob makes good tips in the rest of the article.

Check the vintage of the systems in your server racks, and replace energy and space hogs. Unlike fine wine, computer hardware rarely ages gracefully. Rooting out old systems is often the easiest way to make a data center more efficient. Old hardware almost always consumes more space and power than new systems. Older systems are also usually more difficult to cool efficiently. Switching to more modern systems often allows for impressive consolidation ratios ranging from 2:1 to 10:1. You gain space and save energy even as you increase your computing power.

Tie IT decision makers to their facilities counterparts. Regardless of how much electricity is being consumed by the data center, chief information officers aren't usually the ones writing the utility checks. This disconnect often fuels an unnecessary debate about the importance of compute power over cost savings. IT and facilities organizations need to collaborate to make sure both understand how energy-efficient computing will help address both. If you take the improved energy efficiency, the reduced space utilization and the rebates on servers offered by many municipal power providers, the cost to go green begins to approach negligible.

Look at virtualization and container technologies. Using the right container technologies as part of your virtualization approach isolates applications and services by using flexible, software-defined boundaries. Taking this direction can allow you to achieve even greater compression in both servers and storage. For example, one customer I worked with implemented a new storage system with built-in virtualization and eliminated 40 terabytes of physical capacity, reducing storage power and cooling costs by 60%.

Turn on the meter at the rack level. Legacy measurement of watts per square foot in a data center may show the room is running fine on average, but in reality you have hot spots throughout that are damaging equipment. Most data centers measure load at the perimeter of the data center, which predictably makes things unpredictable. It is important to take metering one step further. It needs to be measured at the rack level (watts per rack) to truly enable energy efficiency. This enables you to reduce power consumption by pinpointing attention on certain areas in a data center instead of using the traditional, scattershot approach of cranking up the fans when a particular area in the data center starts to run hot.

Note: Container Technologies mentioned are the type in this Sun White Paper for software containers, not the containers for data center equipment.

Read more

Google’s Green Efforts, Where?

I keep on going back to Google’s http://www.google.com/corporate/green/energy/ site, but for last 6 months I haven’t seen any change.

Going to www.google.com/green redirected me to http://services.google.com/earth/green/

image

The latest press release I can find is dated Jan 17, 2008 http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/20080117_googleorg.html

Has Google figured out it really isn’t that Green and has stopped tooting its own horn?  As I wrote before.

Google gets an F, Chevron A+ on California Sustainability Report

With the kids out of school, Environmental Leader wrote.

Chevron ‘A+,’ Google ‘F’ In Sustainability Reporting Efforts

chevron_csr.jpgAn analysis of the social responsibility reporting efforts of California’s largest corporations finds that some, like Chevron, Hewlett-Packard and Walt Disney, publicized their sustainability on their Web sites, while others, like eBay, Google and Apple, rarely mentioned the subject, if at all.

The 132-page report, “Analysis of Sustainability Reporting of Fortune Companies in California” (PDF), produced by the Roberts Environmental Center of Claremont McKenna College, contains a compilation of Pacific Sustainability Index scores evaluating the environmental and social reporting of all California companies on the 2006 Fortune 1000 list. It scores companies based on the reporting, intent and performance of environmental and social sustainability efforts and is the center’s the first geographically based analysis of corporate reporting.

Maybe some of the Google folks reading my blog can direct me to other information.

Read more

ZDNet – Russia as Data Center Hub? Not So Fast, links to GreenM3

Another interesting link to my Russia Data Center Entry from ZDNet, and from Larry Dignan.

Larry DignanLarry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and Editorial Director of ZDNet sister site TechRepublic. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

 

Russia as datacenter hub? Not so fast

Posted by Larry Dignan @ 7:08 pm

Russia apparently could become a datacenter hub. It has hydroelectric power, cold temperatures to keep all those servers cool and a booming economy with lots of engineering talent. But there are enough moving parts to require a little more homework on that Russia as datacenter capital theory.

The Green Data Center blog riffs off an Economist story connecting the datacenters with Russia’s hydroelectric capacity. RusHydro, which owns most of Russia’s hydroelectric plants, has 25 gigawatts of capacity. Why wouldn’t you put up a bunch of data centers in Russia? Om Malik connects a few more dots and notes that datacenters will be clustered near the power production. It only stands to reason that Russia would be a big player.

This is interesting to watch how the idea grows through blogs.  I’ll keep watching my blog metrics to see what other links I get.

Read more

Boulder, CO provides Tax Incentives for IBM’s Green Data Center

IBM’s Green Data Center has been covered by numerous news & blogs, and I didn’t have anything to add until I ran into this article, regarding IBM’s presence in Tulsa, OK and their tax rebates there.

Across the nation, IBM leaves a trail of broken promises

Big Blue takes public benefits, but cuts jobs, underdelivers

By Christine Young

Times Herald-Record

July 27, 2008

It was December 2004, and Tulsa, Okla., was abuzz with excitement.

IBM, which already employed more than 1,200 in Tulsa, had made a deal with the state to add another 1,000 jobs by 2009. In return, Big Blue would get $35.2 million in rebates over 10 years.

Calling it “great news for Tulsa and for all of Oklahoma,” Gov. Brad Henry praised IBM as “a vital and valuable corporate citizen.” He said the deal “signifies good things for both IBM and Tulsa.”

He was only half right.

Since the 2004 agreement, the Oklahoma Tax Commission has sent Big Blue more than $4.4 million in rebates. Yet state figures show the company’s job count is the same today as it was before the deal was signed.

This raises questions for New York, where the ink is still drying on an agreement with IBM that will cost taxpayers $140 million in exchange for promises of jobs and economic development.

So, what happened in Boulder, CO and IBM’s Green Data Center.

In Boulder, Colo., where IBM employs about 3,000, the city doled out a $100,000 tax rebate on top of state incentives worth $632,000 for a “green” data center that opened last month but created no new jobs.

“The city’s money was really an indication to IBM corporate that Boulder really cares about having this company here,” Frances Draper of the Boulder Economic Council told reporters. “That was an incredibly important part of their decision.”

This year IBM has slashed 400 jobs in Boulder.

I wonder if the person who doled out the tax rebates even knows IBM slashed 400 jobs in Boulder.

The author continues on how much people fear IBM.

The dirty secret is that no one wants to take on IBM for fear of losing jobs and hurting the local economy, especially in areas such as Dutchess County, where Big Blue is such a vital player.

“Nobody wants to throw the baby out with the bath water,” said Dutchess County Legislator Joel Tyner.

And so New York went ahead with a pact with IBM, requiring a hefty donation from taxpayers, and announcing it one day before the company’s second-quarter profit jumped a dizzying 22 percent to $2.77 billion, defying even Wall Street’s expectations.

The agreement with the Westchester-based technology giant, announced by Gov. David Paterson on July 15, calls for a $1.5 billion investment by IBM and $140 million by the state.

It includes $75 million from taxpayers for 1,000 new jobs – 325 at Albany Nanotech, and another 675 at an upstate facility that has yet to be named.

The remaining $65 million will help finance the expansion and upgrade of IBM’s East Fishkill plant, in return for IBM’s pledge to retain 1,400 semiconductor jobs at the Dutchess County site.

Read more