Amazon’s James Hamilton Presentation

James Hamilton continues his focus on energy efficiency at Amazon after leaving Microsoft. 

AFCOM Western Washington Chapter Meeting

Earlier today I presented Where Does the Power Go and What to do About it at the Western Washington Chapter of AFCOM. I basically presented the work I wrote up in the CIDR paper: The Case for Low-Cost, Low-Power Servers.

The slides are at: JamesHamilton_AFCOM2009.pdf (1.22 MB).

The general thesis of the talk is that improving data center efficiency by a factor of 4 to 5 is well within reach without substantial innovation or design risk.

Read more

IBM and Digital Realty Trust Discuss Modular and Scalable Data Centers

Data Center Dynamics Focus magazine has an article about IBM and Digital Realty Trust’s efforts on Modular and Scalable data centers.

Modular and Scalable the Way of the Future

19 Feb 2009

by Ambrose McNevin, Editor, DatacenterDynamics FOCUS


Two of the main proponents of the industrialisation of the data center are IBM and Digital Realty Trust, both of which believe that building and equiping data centers is a complicated business, made ever-more complicated when approached by traditional means

Applying industrial manufacturing principals to data center design and construction delivers huge benefi ts, according to IBM and Digital Realty Trust (DRT) And a key part of it is treating generators, UPSs and chillers as components in order to drive out costs at a capital and operational level.
Steve Sams, vice president of global site and facilities for global technology services at IBM, says the company has come to the conclusion that data center design needs to change radically. IBM believes that customers have shifted the way in which they buy technology. Where once they bought a big chunk of IT, used it up and bought another big chunk, technology purchasing has shifted to an on-demand model.
But, says Sams, data centers are still stuck in a paradigm from 30 years ago, where they are built in great big chunks, used up bit by bit and then another is built. “That approach is not capital or operationally cost-effi cient because you spent a ton of money but you are only using a fraction of the capacity you’ve just bought. So we are moving toward a scalable modular design in construction. Customers are buying what they need and then adding to it either from a power and cooling density or fl oor space perspective,” says Sams.

Microsoft has their posts on the concept as well.

http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/our-vision-for-generation-4-modular-data-centers-one-way-of-getting-it-just-right/

http://blogs.technet.com/msdatacenters/archive/2008/12/08/microsoft-s-generation-4-data-center-vision-the-architects-perspective.aspx

Google should be coming soon.

Amazon I don’t know if we’ll here anything about their data centers for a while, but James Hamilton does continue to blog about the rest of the industry.

Read more

Decoupling – Energy Efficient Words in Stimulus Package

Earth2Tech has a post on energy efficiency and the Stimulus package.

The Most Important Words in the Stimulus Package for Energy Efficiency

Written by Katie Fehrenbacher

No Comments

Posted February 20th, 2009 at 12:00 am in Policy

The most important provision in the stimulus package for promoting energy efficiency in the U.S. could be a piece of ambiguous language wrapped up in a section on state energy grants. A few sentences encourages states to consider a policy for utilities known as decoupling (though the stimulus text doesn’t name it specifically) in return for energy grants. Decoupling, a strategy that has proven successful at promoting energy efficiency in states like California, disconnects utilities’ sales from their profits, and thus encourages utilities to implement energy efficiency programs. The text in the stimulus bill doesn’t require decoupling per se in order to get funds, but requires the state governors to get certification from their respective commissions that the states in question will:

“…seek to implement…a general policy that ensures that utility financial incentives are aligned with helping their customers use energy more efficiently and that provide timely cost recovery and a timely earnings opportunity for utilities associated with cost-effective and verifiable efficiency savings, in a way that sustains or enhances utility customers’ incentives to use energy more efficiently.”

What is the excitement?

Fans of energy efficiency were electrified when House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) introduced “decoupling” as a condition for state energy grants in the House’s version of the stimulus package. But the language in the final package, which Obama signed into law this week, was toned down from Waxman’s original provision.

Reid Detchon, executive director of the Energy Future Coalition, said: “Most utilities make more money by selling more energy than they do by saving it. Flipping that incentive structure is the key to unlocking greater national investment in energy efficiency.”

But get ready to prove your energy efficiency with monitor.  Note from the above text, the word verifiable.  This means you need to prove your energy savings for a green data center.

“…seek to implement…a general policy that ensures that utility financial incentives are aligned with helping their customers use energy more efficiently and that provide timely cost recovery and a timely earnings opportunity for utilities associated with cost-effective and verifiable efficiency savings, in a way that sustains or enhances utility customers’ incentives to use energy more efficiently.”

Read more

Data Center opinions on Obama’s Effect

SearchDatacenter has a post with a variety of IT opinions.

The Obama effect on IT operations: Data center panel weighs in

Will President Obama's campaign promises bring change for data centers? How will increased oversight of financial systems affect IT operations? Continued digitization of health care? Increased likelihood of passing carbon cap-and-trade legislation that would affect energy prices? Incentives for green business?

W e asked our data center advisory board, made up of CIOs, facilities execs, admins and analysts, how the Obama administration will affect IT operations.

If I was going to place bets i agree with Christian Belady’s comment.

Prepare to report on carbon emissions for the data center
I think one of the things that we can expect is that companies will be required to report carbon emissions, and a significant part of the emissions will be from data centers. Many of you may know that I have advocated the importance of measurement over the years, and those who have embraced [a measurement strategy] will find carbon reporting trivial.

For Microsoft, tools like Scry can report carbon emissions already at the server, rack or data center level. A few other companies are doing the same. For the rest, adoption and investment of real time measurement techniques will need to happen fast. As a result, companies will have to spend much of their resources making this happen in an unforgiving economy -- not the best place to be.

-- Christian Belady, P.E., principal power and cooling architect, Microsoft

Read more

Visiting Apple Computer, What is Their Secret to Developing Great Products?

Last week I was able to catch up with three great friends who I worked with at Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL).  It has been 17 years since I left, and it felt like a surrealistic dream sitting in the cafeteria watching thousands of people going through, recognizing a few here and there, but after 17 years there were few familiar faces.

image

At one point in our conversation, one friend said Apple needs a person like Steve Jobs, because it needs a Dictator. I agreed, but offered a better description.  What Apple needs is a Chief Showman, and Jobs fills that role well. We continued the conversation that almost all product development is done in Cupertino as people need to be close to Jobs to show their progress. The only product development outside the area is international localization. While almost all high tech companies have shifted development outside the US, Apple is alone focusing development in the US surrounding its corporate campus. Working in small development teams to drive innovation.

But, that is not the secret.

When Steve Jobs was pushed out in 1985, John Sculley had his phase. Then Sculley was pushed out and Michael Spindler had his stint, and was pushed out. Then Ellen Hancock and Gil Amelio. This last phase was some of the darkest days of Apple with losses and low stock price.  Ellen Hancock brought in the IBM mindset. In 1997, Apple purchased NeXT, and Steve Jobs was able orchestrate the removal of Gil and Ellen.

Recognize a pattern? Apple went through a series of managers that was focused on a Top Down Management approach as sited in one of the wikipedia posts above.

In 2007, Jobs summed up his predecessor's tenure with a quote that he attributed to Amelio:

"Apple is like a ship with a hole in the bottom, and my job is to point the ship in the right direction"

Apple was able to reject the cancerous growth of clueless management who knew little about developing great product products like the Apple II and Mac.  It started with John Sculley, then the cancer grew with Michael Spindler, and became life threatening with Gil Amelio and Ellen Hancock. Upper and Middle management was in a “careerism” mode.

Careerism is the overwhelming desire or urge to advance one's own career or social status, usually at the expense of other personal interests or social growth.[citation needed]

Careerism is not simply the desire to succeed.[citation needed] In the work place, careerist individuals are often seen as conniving workers who will stop at nothing to succeed.[citation needed]

Apple was in danger of going out of business, and Microsoft was hovering with the success of Windows 95 to squash the Mac. Steve Jobs was able to cut the cancer off and remove it from Apple’s culture.  It took a while to recover, but Apple has had steady growth since 1997.

image

For the good of industry we can hope Steve Jobs recovers from his latest illness.  He has shown a different way of developing products that beats all the rest of the industry.  Apple has beat back Microsoft and the PC industry, the audio/video players, and gone from nowhere to be “the phone”.  Apple is competing against the broadest range of technology companies and winning consistently.

I’ve had the pleasure of being at Apple for 7 years and working at Microsoft for 14 years watched it as an outsider, yet having insights to how Microsoft has tried to compete against Apple.

Apple’s secret is it is a cancer survivor, rejecting a way that doomed its existence.

Read more