Who drives your data center? Finance or Operations

Most of you are hard core data center folks.  Operating a data center can be a pain or put you in the "zone" so you can focus on bigger issues to run the data center.  A good analogy is like driving a car.  How many of you would like to drive a data center that is designed by a bunch of finance guys?  This issue is illustrated by Bob Lutz in "Car Guys vs. Bean Counters."  BusinessWeek reviews the book.

In Car Guys, Lutz argues that Detroit’s steady decline can be blamed on the fact that there aren’t enough Bob Lutzes anymore. After legendary designer and car-guy’s-car-guy Bill Mitchell retired as GM’s design chief in 1977, Lutz writes, the balance of power—at the company, in particular, and in Detroit, in general—began shifting from the car guys to the number crunchers. As a consequence, product planners determined which customers to target with a new sedan or wagon; engineers fretted over inexpensive assembly; and managers fretted about cheap mass production. Only at the end were designers summoned to wrap a steel body around a nearly completed vehicle.

The results, Lutz laments, were the not-so-fondly remembered Cadillac Cimarron, GMC Envoy XUV, Pontiac Aztek, and others.

How many of you have walked into a data center and you can tell the data center was driven primarily by number crunchers who didn't have a clue what the electrical, mechanical, or operational issues are.  They have a budget.  Hit it.

What the finance guys miss is you can't reduce outages by saying you X nine's of availability.  One of the top things that is going to affect your outage is operations.  And Operations is going to be #1 when it comes to mean time to repair to reduce the outage time.

Now there are some technical staff who are like a Tim Allen character who like the "sweetest" tools that give them a jolt of adrenaline, ups their testosterone level, and a new thing they can brag about driving envy in their friends.  

NewImage

There is a balance of designing, and being fiscally responsible.  The days of the over designed data centers are in the past and are being phased out as too expensive.

Part of the problem though for an Operations guy vs. a Finance guy is almost always the Finance guy is better at the company politics.

Lutz: This is the downside of being a creative person who does not play the political game too well. If I had,for instance, been a little bit more circumspect in my dealings with Lee Iacocca and perhaps had held my mouth, I might well have been his successor at Chrysler Corporation.

Ryssdal: Seems kind of an easy answer: You shot your mouth too much.

Lutz: I tend to be a person, when I don't know something I say, "I don't know, I'll have to look it up." I think boards like a CEO who is totally buttoned up, has all the figures. People with my personality generally don't make CEO.

How many Data Center Operations Guys are good at politics?

Can you see the Changes in the Data Center industry? We all suffer from Change Blindness

I was sitting down with a data center executive for lunch yesterday and we chatted about a bunch of different things.  Much of what we shared was observations and perspectives on what is going on in the data center industry.

One of the things we laughed about is the number of people, a very large number of the people who based their perception of what is going based on in the data center industry on what they read.  Whenever we read something that doesn't make sense, we can check with friends, or just know the news doesn't make jive with other data we have.

Part of what contributes to being able to recognize the truth from fiction is whether you understand how we all suffer from Change Blindness.  Change Blindness is many times worse inside a company where people don't get out much, and compare their observations with others.

Change Blindness

  • Posted 01.27.11
  • NOVA scienceNOW

Psychologists who study the fascinating phenomenon of change blindness know that merely looking at something is not the same as actively paying attention to it. As the demonstration in this video shows, people can be blind to significant changes in a visual scene that are obvious to someone who expects that these changes are going to happen.

LAUNCH VIDEORunning Time: 00:51
 

The data center growth that doesn't get reported, the big players are growing much faster

I read this Network Computing article that was reporting on an Uptime Study.

Data Center Study: The Big Get Bigger

 

Business success goes to those that can strategically and efficiently wield technology, and in this data saturated and hyper-connected age, that requires data centers. The latest Uptime Institute Data Center Industry Survey demonstrates that scale matters and operating data centers and computer rooms, which was never a task for amateurs, is increasingly the realm of those that make data centers their core business.

Uptime's survey, with responses from 1,000 data center facilities operators, IT managers and senior executives from around the globe, shows data center operators are expecting healthy budgets, with nearly a third in the U.S. and Europe seeing increases of 10% or more. Most of the bump is driven by third-party operators, which the Uptime Institute defines as "companies that provide computing capacity as a service in any form: Software as a Service, cloud computing, multi-tenant colocation, or wholesale data center providers."

The really big players Google, Microsoft, Amazon.com, Facebook, and Apple are not going to fill out out an Uptime Institute Survey to report their growth.  I define the BIG as those who run 100,000 servers plus.

Netcraft reports on AWS's growth of 10% in 4 months.

NewImage

NewImage

Surveys are good for those who don't know.  For those who know they would laugh at growth of the big players estimated in the 10% + range.

 

Virtualization is 50 years old, maybe the ones excited about virtualization don't remember the mainframe

IBM Systems Magazine has an article on the history of virtualization.

Origins Back to the Mainframe


While often considered a new concept, the idea of virtualization is more than a half-century old. In 1959, computer program language pioneer Christopher Strachey published “Processing Time Sharing in Large Fast Computers” at the International Conference on Information Processing at UNESCO in New York. This article dealt with the use of multiprogramming time sharing and established a new concept of using large machines to increase the productivity of hardware resources. Multiprogramming was used in the Atlas super computer in the early 1960s.

Virtualization started to share an expensive mainframe.

Starting with Time Sharing

Recognizing a new opportunity, in the early ’60s, the IBM Watson Research Center initiated the M44/44x project to evaluate the time-sharing system concept. The architecture was based on VMs, the main one was an IBM 7044 (M44). The address space of the 44X was resident in the M44 memory hierarchy machines, implemented by means of virtual memory and multiprogramming. After the first experiments, IBM made a series of updates to its architecture and spawned several others projects, including the IBM 7040 and IBM 7094, in conjunction with the Compatible Time Sharing System (CTSS) developed by the Massachusetts Institutes of Technology (MIT).

The latest wave of server virtualization driven by VMware was driven by the realization there were a large number of applications that needed a portion of the server, not even half.  VMware was able to get users to buy VMware to reduce the server costs.

Driving Force

In recent years, enterprises have made virtualization a priority. This has been driven by the need to decrease costs associated with:

  • IT facilities—space, power and cooling
  • Software—licenses, maintenance and support
  • Hardware—servers, storage, network switches and routers
  • Administration—site, server, software, applications and data

In the article IBM goes on to state that it has the longest history of virtualization, there it is the most advanced.  There are many users who don't know the history of IBM's virtualization efforts and wouldn't consider a 40-year head start to be advantage.

 

These motivators have contributed to the evolution of virtualization technology, and the introduction of a multitude of proprietary on non-proprietary products. However, IBM’s solutions are the most advanced because of the company’s long history in this area. IBM released its first hypervisor in 1967, giving it a 40-year head start on the competition. Most recently, IBM released the z/VM V6.2 update this past April.

For many, Virtualization expertise is not like Scotch that sells for a premium if it is 40 years old.

Scotch 40 Year Old Whisky

 

If you are looking for the perfect gift for an acquaintance, or simply a great libation to ponder over, we have a superb selection; different regions, different styles and different ages, we have a whisky for every palate. We offer a great range of 40 year old whiskies. These are very well aged, and thus extremely rare. These are in limited supply and offer an outstanding amount of oaken maturity and complexity. These are collector's items. We have 40 year old Scotch whiskies. These are spirits with a massively broad flavour profile. It is surprising just how much variation there can in one country. If you're still undecided, then why not get in touch with us. We would be more than happy to point you in the right direction, we have a team of whisky zealots at the ready to recommend the perfect whisky for any occasion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NewImage

DatacenterDynamics Seattle, Sept 12, 2013, Hilton Bellevue

DatacenterDynamics Seattle is coming on Sept 12, 2013.  I've gone to the show for the last 5 years and seen it grow larger every year.

12Sep
SeattleHILTON BELLEVUE
 

DatacenterDynamics Converged Seattle is THE data center industry event in the Pacific Northwest. Join us to learn the latest strategies and best practices from leading end users and cloud-scale data center operators at the region’s must-attend event.

Peter Gross will presenting the 2013 DCD North America Award to Christian Belady at 9:30

Presentation of the 2013 DCD North American Award for Outstanding Contribution to the Industry

Peter Gross
Vice President of Mission Critical Systems, Bloom Energy

Christian Belady
GM - Data Center Services, Microsoft Corporation

I am on a panel with Peter and Peter at 3:10p.

Reliability, Efficiency, and Sustainability for Mission Critical Systems

Peter M. Curtis
President & CEO, Power Management Concepts LLC

Peter Gross
Vice President of Mission Critical Systems, Bloom Energy

Dave Ohara
President, GreenM3 LLC

The program is here and it looks to be one of the best ones for the Seattle event.